Open Access

Correlation Between the Transient Elevation of Peripheral Eosinophil Count During Radiotherapy and Acute Diarrhea

KOBAYASHI TAKAKO 1
ISOHASHI FUMIAKI 1
EINO DAISUKE 1
TANAKA KAZUNORI 1
SAWADA KENJIRO 2
UEDA YUTAKA 2
KOBAYASHI EIJI 2
TOMIMATSU TAKUJI 2
KIMURA TADASHI 2
  &  
OGAWA KAZUHIKO 1

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

2Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis Sep-Oct; 1(4): 331-337 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10044
Received 01 June 2021 | Revised 08 June 2023 | Accepted 06 July 2021
Corresponding author
Fumiaki Isohashi, MD, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 (D10) Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. Tel: +81 668793482, Fax: +81 668793489 isohashi@radonc.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the change in peripheral eosinophil count during postoperative pelvic radiotherapy and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities in patients with cervical cancer. Patients and Methods: The medical records of 163 patients with cervical cancer who underwent postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed. Results: Among the peripheral blood cell counts, transient elevation of the eosinophil count was observed during radiotherapy. Of the 163 patients, 117 developed grade ≥2 diarrhea during radiotherapy, and 25 patients developed grade ≥2 late GI toxicities. In multivariate analysis, the maximum eosinophil count and age emerged as independent predictors of grade ≥2 acute diarrhea during radiotherapy, while bowel bag V40 Gy and age were predictive of grade ≥2 late GI toxicities. Conclusion: Early detection of transient elevation of eosinophil may facilitate early treatment of acute diarrhea during radiotherapy.
Keywords: Acute diarrhea, cervical neoplasm, eosinophil, late, postoperative, toxicity

Patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy (RT) after abdominal surgery have considerable acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (1). A multi-institutional observational study in patients with postoperative uterine cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and three-dimensional RT (3DRT) showed rates of grade ≥3 acute and late GI toxicities of 19% and 17%, respectively (2). Dose–volume histogram parameters of the small bowel have emerged as predictors of acute and late GI toxicities (3-6), and use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) may reduce such toxicities. Several reports have indicated that IMRT can reduce the radiation doses to the small bowel and is associated with lower rates of GI toxicities than 3DRT (7-9). However, despite the use of IMRT, patients still experience acute GI toxicities. A study of patients with postoperative uterine cervical cancer treated with IMRT showed acute GI toxicities of grades ≥2 and ≥3 at rates of 63% and 20%, respectively (5). Therefore, there is a need for alternative methods of reducing GI toxicities, particularly in the acute phase.

Eosinophils are pro-inflammatory leukocytes that comprise a small percentage of circulating blood cells but play an important role in inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic GI disorders (10,11). However, the relationship between the peripheral eosinophil count and GI toxicity due to RT has not been well studied. Here, we investigated the association of GI toxicities with the change in peripheral eosinophil count during postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with cervical cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients. The study was performed as a retrospective chart review and was approved by our Institutional Review Board (approval no. 19452). Our hospital initiated concurrent use of chemotherapy with RT in April 2000, and a total of 212 patients with uterine cervical cancer of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2008 stage IB1-IIB underwent radical hysterectomy and postoperative RT between April 2000 and August 2016. Postoperative RT was indicated when a pathological report included one of the following high-risk prognostic factors: Parametrial invasion, pelvic node metastasis, and a positive surgical margin; or one of the following intermediate-risk prognostic factors: Deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and a large tumor (>4 cm in diameter). Following initial review, 49 patients were excluded from the study: 18 who received extended-field RT without CCRT because of multiple lymph node metastases (12), 16 who refused CCRT, three who received intracavitary brachytherapy with RT because of a close surgical margin, eight who were lost to follow-up within 1 year, and four early patients who did not undergo treatment-planning computed tomography in the two-dimensional (2D) RT era. Thus, data were analyzed for 163 patients treated with whole-pelvic (WP)-CCRT with a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy. WP-CCRT was delivered with 3DRT planning starting in April 2008 and with IMRT planning starting in October 2010. 2DRT planning used an anteroposterior parallel opposing technique and 3DRT planning used the four-field box technique (0˚, 90˚, 180˚, 270˚). The prescribed radiation doses were 50 Gy in 25 fractions before October 2010. After IMRT was started in October 2010, the prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. WP-CCRT with 3DRT or IMRT was performed as previously described (4,5). During the 2D and 3DRT eras, no normal structures were contoured prior to treatment. In IMRT planning, the bowel bag was contoured before treatment due to use of normal tissue constraints. The bowel bag for 2D or 3DRT was contoured retrospectively for analysis in this study, using methods that have been previously described (4). CCRT administered to all patients included weekly nedaplatin (35 mg/m2) (n=144, 88%) and weekly carboplatin (area under the curve: 2.0, Calvert’s formula) plus paclitaxel (35 mg/m2) (n=19, 12%).

Evaluation of acute and late toxicities. Toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0 (13). All patients were hospitalized while receiving treatment, allowing for daily assessment of the number of defecations for each patient. Based on these results, the grade of ’diarrhea’ was evaluated every day during RT. Blood cell counts for each patient were assessed on a weekly basis. When blood samples were obtained more than twice a week, the highest value was used. Peripheral blood counts at 1 month after RT were also obtained. Late toxicities were defined as those that persisted or presented beyond 3 months after completion of RT. Data for late GI toxicities, including each toxicity grade, were collected from follow-up records.

Statistical analysis. Differences in weekly blood cell counts were evaluated by analysis of variance. Univariate analysis using Fisher’s exact test was performed for onset of grade ≥2 acute diarrhea during RT or late GI toxicities. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis of each parameter was performed to select the most relevant threshold. The correlation between bowel bag V40 Gy and maximum eosinophil counts was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model was performed to identify risk factors associated with grade ≥2 acute diarrhea during RT or with Iate GI toxicities. In addition, multivariate analysis using a multiple regression model was performed to identify risk factors associated with the number of days of grade ≥1 acute diarrhea during RT. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the first day of RT to the day of relapse or death, or if no event occurred, to the day of last follow-up. The actuarial PFS rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences between groups compared by log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided and p<0.05 or a 95% confidence interval not encompassing 1 was considered significant.

Results

Patient characteristics are shown in Table I. The median follow-up period was 53 [interquartile range (IQR)=33-72] months, and the median age at diagnosis was 49 (IQR=40-57) years. No patient had a history of asthma. Of the 163 patients, 151 (93%) developed grade ≥1 diarrhea during RT, including 34 (21%) grade 1, 63 (39%) grade 2 and 54 (33%) grade 3 cases as the maximum grade. The median time from the start of RT to onset of grade ≥2 diarrhea was 14 (IQR=11-21) days. The chart review also revealed that 25 patients (15%) developed late GI toxicities of grade ≥2, including seven (4%) grade 2, 10 (6%) grade 3, and eight (5%) grade 4 cases.

Changes in blood cell counts were examined weekly, including white blood cell, lymphocyte, neutrophil, monocyte, basophil, and eosinophil counts (Figure 1). Based on the average number of blood cells, a trend for transient elevation was observed for eosinophils only. The average eosinophil count in weeks 3 and 4 was significantly higher than those in weeks 1 and 2, and that in week 4 was also significantly higher than in subsequent weeks and after completion of RT. A similar trend for transient elevation was not seen for any other blood cells. The average monocyte counts in week 2-4 were not statistically significantly altered.

In univariate analysis of the onset of grade ≥2 diarrhea during RT and late GI toxicities (Table II), greater bowel bag V40 Gy was significantly associated with grade ≥2 acute diarrhea during RT (p=0.037); younger age (p=0.058) and higher maximum eosinophil count during RT (p=0.055) tended to be associated with grade ≥2 acute diarrhea; and younger age, lower BMI, greater bowel bag V40 Gy, and chemotherapy regimens (use of nedaplatin) were significantly associated with late GI toxicities. Correlation coefficient analysis showed a weak but significant positive correlation between bowel bag V40 Gy and maximum eosinophil count exceeding 274/μl (r=0.283, p<0.001).

Cox regression model analysis was performed using age, body mass index (BMI), bowel bag V40 Gy, and maximum eosinophil count as variables (Table III). The patients were divided into two groups based on the cut-off values for acute diarrhea and late GI toxicities. Low BMI and bowel bag V40 Gy have been reported to be potential risk factor for GI toxicities (3-5). In Cox regression analysis, high maximum eosinophil count [hazard ratio (HR)=1.558, p=0.028] and younger age (HR=0.663, p=0.033) emerged as significant risk factors for development of acute diarrhea; and greater bowel bag V40 Gy (HR=4.357, p=0.007) and age (HR=0.375, p=0.025) were significant risk factors for development of late GI toxicities. Multiple regression analysis using age, BMI, bowel bag V40 Gy, and maximum eosinophil count (Table IV) showed that maximum eosinophil count was associated with the number of days of grade ≥1 acute diarrhea (p=0.020). Eosinophil count had no significant effect on PFS (Figure 2).

Discussion

In this study, we identified a transient elevation in eosinophil count during RT in patients with cervical cancer treated with postoperative CCRT. We further found that this increase in eosinophils was correlated with acute diarrhea during RT, both in terms of increased severity and prolonged duration. Transient elevation in eosinophils during RT was not correlated with late GI toxicities. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a correlation of transient elevation in eosinophil count during RT and acute diarrhea. The median onset time of grade ≥2 diarrhea was 2 weeks and the peak eosinophil count occurred at 3 weeks. Therefore, elevation of eosinophils is difficult to use as an indicator of the severity of diarrhea but may be a useful indicator of its prolonged duration, which could facilitate early treatment of this condition.

In the current study, we were unable to determine if eosinophil counts were elevated as a result of radiation-induced intestinal damage or whether eosinophils induced by radiation to the intestine caused intestinal damage. Previous studies provide some insight into the relationship between radiation-induced intestinal damage and eosinophils, although only a few have investigated the potential for suppressing acute diarrhea by suppressing the transient elevation of eosinophils. Bowen et al. found that the levels of serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP; also known as eosinophil granule protein) increased at week 4 compared with those before RT in patients with gynecological malignancies undergoing postoperative pelvic RT. However, no correlation was observed between acute GI toxicity at week 4 and serum ECP level (14). Wedlake et al. found no significant increase in ECP from baseline to 5 weeks of RT (15), and more recently, Takemura et al. reported that eosinophil depletion suppresses radiation-induced small intestinal fibrosis in a mouse model (16).

The relationship between eosinophils and IBD has been well studied. Eosinophils have been implicated in the pathogenesis and intensity of IBD, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (10,17). Immunohistopathological studies have shown accumulation and activation of eosinophils in actively inflamed intestinal mucosa of patients with IBD, and elevated levels of chemokines relevant for chemotaxis of eosinophils and release of mediators from eosinophils are detected in the serum and feces of patients with active IBD. Animal studies have shown that abrogation of chemokines promoting eosinophil chemotaxis and circulation resulted in reduced severity of murine experimental colitis, suggesting a pro-inflammatory role for eosinophils in IBD. Furthermore, selective deletion of certain eosinophil-specific granule products resulted in attenuation of experimental intestinal inflammation (18). A phase II trial is currently underway to investigate the efficacy of bertilimumab, an eotaxin-1-neutralizing antibody, in ulcerative colitis (ClinicalTrials, gov identifier: NCT01671956). Therefore, the potential benefits of eosinophil-targeted therapy in treatment of IBD will become more clearly understood, and this evidence will be useful for determining whether suppression of the transient elevation of eosinophils can limit the onset of acute diarrhea after RT.

Some reports have shown that eosinophil-related factors are correlated with prognosis in uterine cervical cancer. Holub et al. found that increases in eosinophils and in the eosinophil:lymphocyte ratio were related to better overall survival in uterine cervical cancer (19). Yamazaki et al. reported that transient elevation in interleukin-5 level and eosinophil count was induced by RT and was correlated with better prognosis in uterine cervical cancer (20). In contrast, we found no significant difference in PFS in association with elevation of eosinophils in the current study. One difference between the previous studies and our study is the presence of a gross tumor. The previous studies involved a macroscopic tumor in the uterine cervix and were curative in intent, while we only included postoperative cases with no macroscopic tumor.

The findings of this study should be interpreted within the following limitations. Firstly, this was a retrospective study using data from a single institution, and heterogeneity in the treatment planning approach over the study period (2D, 3DRT, IMRT) and the lack of a prespecified model or protocol are important limitations of the data and analysis. Secondly, we used weekly nedaplatin as CCRT for most patients, whereas CCRT with 40 mg/m2 cisplatin weekly is now accepted as the standard first-line treatment and we cannot exclude the possibility that the elevations in eosinophil count found in this study may be chemotherapy-type specific. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm whether the same results are obtained during treatment with standard 40 mg/m2 cisplatin weekly.

In conclusion, this study showed that a transient elevation in eosinophils correlated with acute diarrhea following pelvic RT. Further research is needed to determine if suppression of this effect can prevent the onset of acute diarrhea in patients undergoing CCRT.

Conflicts of Interest

All Authors declare no conflicts of interest with regards to preparation and content of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Takako Kobayashi performed data acquisition and analysis and prepared the first draft of the article. Fumiaki Isohashi coordinated the entire study, obtained IRB approval, performed data acquisition and analysis and suggested corrections and improvements of the article. Daisuke Eino, Kazunori Tanaka, Kenjiro Sawada, Yutaka Ueda, Eiji Kobayashi, Takuji Tomimatsu, Tadashi Kimura and Kazuhiko Ogawa performed data acquisition and analysis and suggested corrections and improvements of the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final article.

References

1 Peters WA 3rd Liu PY Barrett RJ 2nd Stock RJ Monk BJ Berek JS Souhami L Grigsby P Gordon W Jr & Alberts DS Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 18(8) 1606 - 1613 2000. PMID: 10764420. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1606
2 Isohashi F Takano T Onuki M Arimoto T Kawamura N Hara R Kawano Y Ota Y Inokuchi H Shinjo H Saito T Fujiwara S Sawasaki T Ando K Horie K Okamoto H Murakami N Hasumi Y Kasamatsu T & Toita T A multi-institutional observational study on the effects of three-dimensional radiotherapy and weekly 40-mg/m2 cisplatin on postoperative uterine cervical cancer patients with high-risk prognostic factors. Int J Clin Oncol. 24(5) 575 - 582 2019. PMID: 30580379. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-01380-z
3 Isohashi F Mabuchi S Akino Y Yoshioka Y Seo Y Suzuki O Tamari K Yoshino K Sawada K Ueda Y Kobayashi E Sumida I Mizuno H Okubo H Kimura T & Ogawa K Dose-volume analysis of predictors for chronic gastrointestinal complications in patients with cervical cancer treated with postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and whole-pelvic radiation therapy. J Radiat Res. 57(6) 668 - 676 2016. PMID: 27342839. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw037
4 Isohashi F Yoshioka Y Mabuchi S Konishi K Koizumi M Takahashi Y Ogata T Maruoka S Kimura T & Ogawa K Dose-volume histogram predictors of chronic gastrointestinal complications after radical hysterectomy and postoperative concurrent nedaplatin-based chemoradiation therapy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 85(3) 728 - 734 2013. PMID: 22727885. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.021
5 Isohashi F Mabuchi S Yoshioka Y Seo Y Suzuki O Tamari K Yamashita M Unno H Kinose Y Kozasa K Sumida I Otani Y Kimura T & Ogawa K Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with concurrent nedaplatin-based chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer: comparison of outcomes, complications, and dose-volume histogram parameters. Radiat Oncol. 10 180 2015. PMID: 26300325. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0486-5
6 Jadon R Higgins E Hanna L Evans M Coles B & Staffurth J A systematic review of dose-volume predictors and constraints for late bowel toxicity following pelvic radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 14(1) 57 2019. PMID: 30943992. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1262-8
7 Klopp AH Yeung AR Deshmukh S Gil KM Wenzel L Westin SN Gifford K Gaffney DK Small W Jr Thompson S Doncals DE Cantuaria GHC Yaremko BP Chang A Kundapur V Mohan DS Haas ML Kim YB Ferguson CL Pugh SL Kachnic LA & Bruner DW Patient-reported toxicity during pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy: NRG Oncology-RTOG 1203. J Clin Oncol. 36(24) 2538 - 2544 2018. PMID: 29989857. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.4273
8 Chen MF Tseng CJ Tseng CC Kuo YC Yu CY & Chen WC Clinical outcome in posthysterectomy cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent Cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy: comparison with conventional radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 67(5) 1438 - 1444 2007. PMID: 17394944. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.005
9 Lan ML Yu X Xiao H Zhou P Hu N Li J & Wang G Clinical outcomes and toxicity of postoperative intensity-modulated versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in patients with cervical cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 12(4) 430 - 436 2016. PMID: 26923341. DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12476
10 Travers J & Rothenberg ME Eosinophils in mucosal immune responses. Mucosal Immunol. 8(3) 464 - 475 2015. PMID: 25807184. DOI: 10.1038/mi.2015.2
11 Villanacci V Reggiani-Bonetti L Leoncini G Parente P Cadei M Albarello L Mandelli G & Caputo A Histopathology of Non-IBD Colitis. A practical approach from the Italian Group for the study of the gastrointestinal tract (GIPAD). Pathologica. 113(1) 54 - 65 2021. PMID: 33686310. DOI: 10.32074/1591-951X-234
12 Mabuchi S Okazawa M Isohashi F Ohta Y Maruoka S Yoshioka Y Enomoto T Morishige K Kamiura S & Kimura T Postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy versus extended-field irradiation for early-stage cervical cancer patients with multiple pelvic lymph node metastases. Gynecol Oncol. 120(1) 94 - 100 2011. PMID: 20956013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.016
13 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute.. Available at: https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf.
14 Bowen JM Newbold K Blake P Wild G Egner W Norman AR & Andreyev HJ Do serum levels of eosinophil granule-derived protein change in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 17(5) 382 - 384 2005. PMID: 16097571. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2005.01.007
15 Wedlake L McGough C Hackett C Thomas K Blake P Harrington K Tait D Khoo V Dearnaley D & Andreyev HJ Can biological markers act as non-invasive, sensitive indicators of radiation-induced effects in the gastrointestinal mucosa. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 27(10) 980 - 987 2008. PMID: 18315578. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03663.x
16 Takemura N Kurashima Y Mori Y Okada K Ogino T Osawa H Matsuno H Aayam L Kaneto S Park EJ Sato S Matsunaga K Tamura Y Ouchi Y Kumagai Y Kobayashi D Suzuki Y Yoshioka Y Nishimura J Mori M Ishii KJ Rothenberg ME Kiyono H Akira S & Uematsu S Eosinophil depletion suppresses radiation-induced small intestinal fibrosis. Sci Transl Med. 10(429) eaan0333 2018. PMID: 29467297. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan0333
17 Click B Anderson AM Koutroubakis IE Rivers CR Babichenko D Machicado JD Hartman DJ Hashash JG Dunn MA Schwartz M Swoger J Barrie A III Wenzel SE Regueiro M & Binion DG Peripheral eosinophilia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease defines an aggressive disease phenotype. Am J Gastroenterol. 112(12) 1849 - 1858 2017. PMID: 29112200. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.402
18 Woodruff SA Masterson JC Fillon S Robinson ZD & Furuta GT Role of eosinophils in inflammatory bowel and gastrointestinal diseases. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 52(6) 650 - 661 2011. PMID: 21593640. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182128512
19 Holub K & Biete A Impact of systemic inflammation biomarkers on the survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 21(7) 836 - 844 2019. PMID: 30470994. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1991-4
20 Yamazaki H Inoue T Tanaka E Isohashi F Koizumi M Shuo X Nakamura H & Inoue T Pelvic irradiation-induced eosinophilia is correlated to prognosis of cervical cancer patients and transient elevation of serum interleukin 5 level. Radiat Med. 23(5) 317 - 321 2005. PMID: 16342902.